Dangerous hangup so far of Disney + "baby yoda"

Just so you know- I will never buy Disney + or use the service. Just not that big of a Disney fan but other people are so much they buy and view and give such domensicated cute names to stories and topics. For instance in one "M" lettered show features a creature if Yoda's species but as a baby. But from what I have read online, the baby itself is not Yoda. Yet people call it Baby Yoda. People will disregard the real realities of the story to make some cute generalization in fondness. In this case Baby Yoda. While the audience might be done of doing this, it does not come at a consequence. The origin company and in this case will market items to make more money off of people. It will keep profit off the " fondness" to itself which of course it did create but a bone headed and if not "would be" innocent audience members. Maybe your girlfriend came up with Baby Yoda and it was to be friendly and not money making. Sharing this item on social media it becomes a thing. In the past people could say similar things and it would be capitalized on but because of social media and how boring the estate is- everything explodes with hot fire like when you introduce any element of fondness to anything in media others can relate and even come about in ideal t heirselves. The vicarious nature of social means vultures like companies always want to pick up profit from a collective fondness. In this case,Baby Yoda. I repeat simply that these companies will ensure no one can make money off  " Baby Yoda" when they would originally if not for social media. I, imagine in the 90s, your mother fan of "m" show could make you and your siblings- Baby Yoda sweaters for Christmas, yes. Then she would make you wear it to school and then in demand of the recognition of fondness many people want the same things and a Baby Yoda sweater company is borne. It would only get in trouble when Disney would realizes it exists if some short haired worker of a boss of sort came in the next winter after Christmas or after the fall in which the sweaters were sold- with a sweater on. The people behind the sweaters maybe sued and filed copyright infringements against but at least it usually be in the public eye. The sweaters gaining so much support from the people, the lawsuit becomes a federal national live coverage case. Or rather people are to know of its outcome and Disney would be rather fucked if it angered the people and is forced eventually regardless of the verdict on your mom to incorporate the mother in the company making sweaters or risk a sum of public likability. The point us Disney will do anything for money and that is make amends. In an era where survilliamce by companies is not limited to a span of months of growth and development of fondness trades but instantly. And of course people want their sweaters and Disney will do anything to " make right to the people and take their money". Really backlighting people over and over for each and every Baby Yoda of fondness to come of Disney +. Convincing them it's alright to develop such great and maybe misinformed feelings off a show and let a company take advantage of that through convincing bartering and branding. I say barter because they usually have to find an angle to appeal appealing and not large add snake that gobbles everyone that dare do anything in the arts. Much to believe this cycle is already beginning, two or one weeks into Disney + running.

I read, oh boy, on IGN.com that Disney is removing Baby Yoda gifs off giphy if I get the name right. Why, because they are afraid of copyright infringement! Because they are the only people who can make money off fondness! Fondness, that would not exist without people viewing their ocontent!  Gifs might as well be the modern sweater and yet can shut it all down in moments after posting after creation! What this does in the promise of the validation of constant creative works by Disney says," you better not create!"  And that," we are the only people who can create, you just watch and we dictate". In sum, Disney becomes more like brainwashing and it's need to please the public is basically not even including folks like your mom in their company making money- no,it's the promise of more shows and materials for creative input of fondness,on your money! They teach you the degeneratization of your self and you should give them money because only they can create and no one else! Social media was to be the new frontier of creativity but for profits they want to take that away because your fondness for their characters is only something they can capitalize on. Soon, let the tirade continue and Disney will work its way into social media(create it's own social media) to make these Baby Yoda items and more wealth than it will from developing items of fondness from shows on the platform! Soon, it don't be long before Disney is trying to shut down artists for any of their ideas begin similar in thought, width or pedujice to their works. Removing gifs of baby Yoda is the first step of removing creative focuses of people to actually create things and be proud of it. Especially when of fondness.

Side note, people behind this Baby Yoda bullshit are basically brainwashed individuals who believe Disney cannot do no wrong! But are surprised when it does and removes their gifs and some are convinced Disney is a god of creativity and creating is no worthy of them. Another real reason Disney + is bad already is that it makes a monopoly god and the company spreads and influences misinformation  that people can not create but consume. Simply because it hinders and dictates to and in the near future threatens any future creative endeavor on the internet or the willingness and culture of people to create, even at all.