Puzzle Two: ZZZ+BUMP.

                   This puzzle involves corporate hindering and special paid interest in the media.
                         Why is Mashable desperate to follow something that would general hurt them and their consumer group? Maybe Mashable is really not for young people but old rich people to brainwash young people. Give you Taylor Swift, a selfish self righteous whore who thinks she can speak for every musician. Like everyone deserves to get money  when you are the prime example of what is wrong with the music industry. Taylor started off as a country artist but now she is just an example of a pop sellout. Maybe because pop appeals to those who can not think and those who are innocent. It also appeals to those who want to brainwash young people to get the most money possible. Should people really follow Taylor Swift in example. There are many musicians better than Taylor Swift who should make more money than her based on the quality of music. Taylor Swift and those fakers of art who not only exist in the music industry but in other industries like the comic book industry should just give up their money to the artists who actually deserve it if they want to be " for the artists". There is such unity between fakers and real artists in any form of art. But one thing is clear. These people will lead to the destruction of an art form and prevent people from making art making them the "sole owners of art" where the art is terrible and  failing.

All artists need hacks, snacks and breaks.

BUMP+ZZZ=
(put response below).